THE REAL THREATS TO HUMANITY

GW/GC is propaganda to keep us focused away from real threats to human health and the environment.

There are areas over the Pacific Ocean where airlines do not fly because radiation levels are so high. You won’t hear this from the mainstream science. Ask your airline pilots about this! Earth has been loosing it’s magnetosphere at .05%/ year for the last 1000 years. This figure seems to be directly proportional to atmospheric loss. In other words in one thousand years we will loose 50% of our atmosphere.

“Rapid changes in the churning movement of Earth’s liquid outer core are weakening the magnetic field in some regions of the planet’s surface, a new study says.

“What is so surprising is that almost sudden, changes take place in the Earth’s magnetic field,” said study co-author Niles Olsen, a geophysicist at the Danish National Space Center in Copenhagen.

“The study published in Nature Geoscience, modeled Earth’s magnetic field using nine years of highly accurate satellite data. Fluctuations in the magnetic field have occurred in several far-flung regions of Earth, the researchers found. In 2003, scientists found pronounced changes in the magnetic field in the Australian region. In 2004, however, the changes were focused on southern Africa.

“The changes “may suggest the possibility the possibility of an upcoming reversal of the geomagnetic field”, said co-author Mioara Mandea, a scientist at the German Research Center for Geosciences in Potsdam. The decline in the Earth’s magnetic field is also opening Earth’s upper atmosphere to intense radiation, scientists say.

“Satellite data show the geomagnetic field decreasing in the South Atlantic region, Mandea said, adding that an oval-shaped area east of Brazil is significantly weaker than similar latitudes in other parts of the world. [Notice they don’t mention the Pacific Ocean region.]

“It is this region that the shielding effect of the magnetic field is severely reduced, thus allowing high-energy particles of the hard radiation belt to penetrate deep into the upper atmosphere to altitudes below a hundred kilometers,” Mandea said.

“This radiation does not influence temperatures on Earth. However, the particles do affect technical and radio equipment and can damage electronics equipment on satellites and airplanes, said Olsen.  ---source National Geographic News 30 June 2008,

“Is there something they are not telling us like the fact that when Earth looses it’s magnetosphere we will wish we had a layer of CO2 to protect us from the deadly space radiation? http://tinyurl.com/6gfyza    

One of the reasons they moved the International Space Station below 350 kilometers was to limit the radiation exposure to its occupants as it passes through parts of the Van Allan belt every three hours.

The human body can only take so much radiation exposure before cell damage has an adverse effect on the liver and immune systems. Frequent flyers might travel once a month but airline pilots are traveling at high altitudes every day. Airline pilots and their crews are getting 30 times more radiation than their frequent flyer passengers. It is written into their retirement contracts that they get extra pay for flying at high altitudes. Some airline pilots are changing jobs to fly low altitude commuter aircraft so that they can extend their carriers.

In the future humans may all have to limit our exposure like we did the past by going underground. They may also wish for more carbon dioxide to shield them from radiation make their gardens grow.  www.GuardDogBooks.com  & www.AlaskaPublishing.com

 

 

Global Warming was invented to keep us focused away from more dire threats to human health and the Environment.

The .033% trace gas carbon dioxide is plant food necessary for us to grow crops and to sustain the ecosystem yet our government is talking about using diesel fuel to pump it underground? How stupid can they get? If humans were some how able to double the amount of Co2 in our atmosphere to .066% it would still be a trace gas.

A recent Scientific American article proposes erecting a giant sun shade made of reflective material above the earth to reflect sunlight back into space at a cost of trillions of dollars—and they call me crazy??

Soil erosion is the “silent global crisis” undermining food production and water availability. Every year, some 62,000 square miles of land looses its vegetation and becomes degraded or turns into desert.

A Cornell University study, which pulls together statistics on soil erosion from more than 125 sources, has found that the US is loosing soil 10 times faster—and China and India 30 to 40 times faster—than the natural replenishment rate.

As a result of erosion over the past 40 years, 30 percent of the world arable land has become unproductive--this at a time when the world population is approaching 7 billion.

Food production has kept pace with population growth by increasing by 50 percent between 1980 and 2000. But it is an open question whether there will be enough food in 2050, with an estimated three billion more mouths to feed.

That means more food has to be produced within the next 50 years than during the last 10,000 years combined. --(source: The Global Report, 30 August 2007

If you like what I am reporting and would like to read more and you think there is a chance that humans might actually get off the planet some day then please go to my web sites and order some of my book.

www.GuardDogBooks.com   &   www.AlaskaPublishing.com

Twenty years ago I had to start thinking in QFT when writing Philosopher's Stone. It took me five years to write the book and my head was spinning in higher dimensions before I finished it. So far I have had about 1000 medical doctors read it and it has been traded around to various university library's for some time now.

Entanglement consists in opposite spins resulting from momentum preservation at the moment of decay/creation. They are not connected by any transcendental cordon umbilical, but just have opposite spins. The claim is that by measuring one I know the other, which is false, as I can only surmise it.
=============================

M-state are combined atoms with all the protons in the center so the nucleus is 8 times larger than a normal atom. Protons are like little magnets of the same polarity. The electrons pair up (Cooper Pair) in opposite directions forming a ring and passing each other at twice the speed of light. Because the particles are so large (about 50 times larger than an atom) the atomic forces between the particles are much weaker than an atom. This makes transmutation of elements possible because they can be ripped apart and transformed into different elements quite easily by magnetic pulses. Planck's constant: E=HF rules.

When charged up with photons the particles disappear from third dimension. 

It’s hard to keep them in a Mason jar as magnetic fields push them through the glass molecules. You have to place the mason jar inside a metal can (Faraday shield) and keep it in the fridge. After you have purified a batch you have to keep it in the fridge because mold loves the stuff.

It is their unique shape that determines their properties. The best information I can gather and my own experience say they outnumber third dimensional matter at ratios of 10,000 to 1 (probably much more near the poles of black holes).  Their shape dictates that they repel magnetic fields and fit the technical definition of a superconductor in that they magnetically resonant couple with each other given magnetic fields of the proper high frequency and they do it with no loss of power. Thus their very existence explains quantum entanglement.

The ancients put it in their bread for higher enlightenment and longevity. They carried it around in the Ark of the Covenant which was a wood box designed to exclude magnetic fields. King Solomon made most of his money selling bread. His bread was highly prized by the kings, priests and princes of other nations who didn't have the technology to make it. 

When they opened the Great Pyramid in 1909 there was a very fine white powder on the walls and floor. Due to its physical shape the particles have anti gravity properties.They swept it up and sent some to London England. They didn' have the testing facilities to test for rhodium and gold in M-state so they threw it away.

In 1948 American soldiers were digging through two 20 by 20-foot store rooms ten feed deep filled with a white powder. They were looking for gold and didn't realize what they were digging through was gold in the m-state.

In the same year archaeologists were excavating an Egyptian gold mine on the Sinai Peninsula. They found six ten by twelve store rooms off to the side and one of them contained six-inches of a very fine white powder. The desert winds blew it away. Mankind has used the stuff for thousands of years for power and  but our modern civilization hasn't got a clue.

I believe the original purpose of the Ark was to communicate with other planets. The story goes; Moses and other adepts could bring forth the Shikana Glory (electric discharge from the M-state inside the Ark) by concentrating on it from a distance. Brain power alone was creating an electron cascade. They ate the stuff and it goes through the blood brain barrier combines with fat and stays there. [David Hudson did platinum, rhodium and gold tests on dried sheep, cow and pig brains to discover that 5% was precious metals.] A powerful adept using 80% instead of the human five or ten percent of their brain practicing fifty or a hundred years could produce holographic images or at least strong thought patterns taking the place of verbal communication.

The information was transmitted instantly to other planets where a similar device was set up in a pyramid. They didn't have to wait years for the slow speed of light to transmit and receive information to the other side of the galaxy or even other galaxies. Additionally they worked with nature and understood it.

Moses and his brother Aaron used it to defeat their enemies by transmitting commands into the heads of the generals or even to stop their hearts if they didn't retreat.

This is Epistemology from someone with 10,000 days of sea time--someone who has crossed Cook Inlet by boat more times than any other living human. www.GuardDogBooks.com

Cooling of Atmosphere Due to CO2 Emission
G. V. CHILINGAR,1 L. F. KHILYUK,1, and O. G. SOROKHTIN2

1Rudolf W. Gunnerman Energy and Environment Laboratory, University of
Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
2Institute of Oceanology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Address correspondence to George Chilingar, Russian Academy of Natural
Sciences, USA Branch, 101 S. Windsor Blvd., Los Angeles, California 90004.
E-mail: gchil...@usc.edu

Abstract

The writers investigated the effect of CO2 emission on the temperature of
atmosphere. Computations based on the adiabatic theory of greenhouse effect
show that increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere results in cooling
rather than warming of the Earth's atmosphere.

Keywords adiabatic theory, CO2 emission, global cooling, global warming

Introduction

Traditional anthropogenic theory of currently observed global warming states that release of carbon dioxide into atmosphere (partially as a result of utilization of fossil fuels) leads to an increase in atmospheric temperature because the molecules of CO2 (and other greenhouse gases) absorb the infrared radiation from the Earth's surface. This statement is based on the Arrhenius hypothesis, which was never verified (Arrhenius, 1896). The
proponents of this theory take into consideration only one component of heat transfer in atmosphere, i.e., radiation. Yet, in the dense Earth's troposphere with the pressure pa > 0:2 atm, the heat from the Earth's surface is mostly transferred by convection.

(Sorokhtin, 2001a). According to our estimates, convection accounts for 67%, water vapor condensation in troposphere accounts for 25%, and radiation accounts for about 8% of the total heat transfer from the Earth's surface to troposphere. Thus, convection is the dominant process of heat transfer in troposphere, and all the theories of Earth's atmospheric heating (or cooling) first of all must consider this process of heat (energy)-mass redistribution in atmosphere (Sorokhtin, 2001a, 2001b; Khilyuk and
Chilingar, 2003, 2004).

When the temperature of a given mass of air increases, it expands, becomes
lighter, and rises. In turn, the denser cooler air of upper layers of troposphere descends and replaces the warmer air of lower layers. This physical system (multiple cells of air convection) acts in the Earth's troposphere like a continuous surface cooler. The cooling effect by air convection can surpass considerably the warming effect of radiation.

The most important conclusion from this observation is that the temperature distribution in the troposphere has to be close to adiabatic because the air mass expands and cools while rising and compresses and heats while dropping.

This does not necessarily imply that at any particular instant distribution of temperature has to be adiabatic. One should consider some averaged distribution over the time intervals of an order of months.

Key Points of the Adiabatic Theory of Greenhouse Effect

By definition, the greenhouse effect is the difference T between the average temperature of planet surface Ts and its effective temperature Te (which is determined by the solar radiation and the Earth's albedo): [much snippage of equations, graphs and text]

Figure 1. Relationship between the temperature and elevation above sea level for (1) existing nitrogen-oxygen atmosphere on Earth and (2) hypothetical carbon dioxide atmosphere.

Figure 2. Relationship between temperature and elevation above Venus surface for (1) existing carbon dioxide atmosphere, and (2) hypothetical nitrogen-oxygen atmosphere.

The averaged temperature distributions for the existing carbon dioxide and hypothetical
nitrogen-oxygen atmosphere on Venus are shown in Figure 2.

Conclusions

During the latest three millennia, one can observe a clear cooling trend in the Earth's climate (Keigwin, 1996; Sorokhtin and Ushakov, 2002; Gerhard, 2004; Khiyuk and Chilingar, 2006; Sorokhtin et al., 2007). During this period, deviations of the global temperature from this trend reached up to 3iC with a clear trend of decreasing global temperature by about 2iC.
Relatively short-term variations in global temperature are mainly caused by the variations in solar activity and are not linked to the changes in carbon dioxide content in atmosphere.

Accumulation of large amounts of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere leads to the cooling, and not to warming of climate, as the proponents of traditional anthropogenic global warming theory believe (Aeschbach-Hertig, 2006). This conclusion has a simple physical explanation: when the infrared radiation is absorbed by the molecules of greenhouse gases, its energy is transformed into thermal expansion of air, which causes convective fluxes of air masses restoring the adiabatic distribution of temperature in the troposphere. Our estimates show that release of small amounts of carbon dioxide (several hundreds ppm), which are typical for the scope of anthropogenic emission, does not influence the global temperature of Earth's atmosphere.

References

Arrhenius, S. 1896. On influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground. Phil. Mag. 41:237-276.

Aeschbach-Hertig, W. 2007. Rebuttal of "On global forces of nature driving the Earth's climate. Are humans involved?" by L. F. Khilyuk and G. V.
Chilingar. Env. Geol.

Bachinskiy, A. I., Putilov, V. V., and Suvorov, N. P. 1951. Handbook of Physics. Moscow: Uchpedgiz, 380 pp.

Gerhard, L. C. 2004. Climate change: Conflict of observational science, theory, and politics. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 88:1211-1220.

Keigwin, L. D. 1996. The little ice age and medieval warm period in the Sargasso Sea. Science 274:1504-1508.

Khilyuk, L. F., Chilingar, G. V., Endres, B., and Robertson, J. 2000. Gas Migration. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company, 389 pp.

Khilyuk, L. F., and Chilingar, G. V. 2003. Global warming: Are we confusing cause and effect? Energy Sources 25:357-370.

Khilyuk, L. F., and Chilingar, G. V. 2004. Global warming and long-term climatic changes: A progress report. Environ. Geol. 46:970-979.

Khilyuk, L. F., and Chilingar, G. V. 2006. On global forces of nature driving the Earth's climate. Are humans involved? Environ. Geol. 50:899-910.

Landau, L. D., and Lifshits, E. M. 1979. Statistical Physics. Moscow: Nauka, 559 pp.

Marov, M. Ya. 1986. Planets of Solar System, Moscow: Nauka, 320 pp.

Robinson, A. B., Baliunas, S. L., Soon, W., and Robinson, Z. W. 1998. Environmental effects of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. [i...@oism.org; i...@marshall.org]

Schimel, D. S. 1995. Global Change Biology, 1:77-91.

Sorokhtin, O. G. 1990. The greenhouse effect of atmosphere in geologic history of Earth. Doklady AN SSSR 315:587-592.

Sorokhtin, O. G. 2001a. Greenhouse effect: Myth and reality. Vestnik Russian Academy of Natural Sciences 1:8-21.

Sorokhtin, O. G. 2001b. Temperature distribution in the Earth. Izvestiya RAN, Physics of Earth 3:71-78.

Sorokhtin, O. G., and Ushakov, S. A. 2002. Evolution of the Earth. Moscow: Moscow Univ. Publishers, 560 pp.

Sorokhtin, O. G., Chilingar, G. V., and Khilyuk, L. F. 2007. Global Warming and Global Cooling. Evolution of Climate on Earth. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 313
pp.

Sorokhtin, O. G., Chilingar, G. V., Khilyuk, L. F., and Gorfunkel, M. V. 2006. Evolution of the Earth's global climate. Energy Sources 29:1-19.

Venus (Atmosphere, Surface and Ecosystem). 1989. Moscow: Nedra, 482 pp.

Voytkevitch, G. V., Kokin, A. V., Miroshnikov, A. E., and Prokhorov, V. G. 1990. Handbook of Geochemistry. Moscow: Nedra, 480 pp.