ATTENTION ALL SENIORS TERRIBLE NEWS...

 ATTENTION ALL SENIORS:
>
>
> Important please read.
>
> ALL SENIORS BETTER READ THIS!!! from a senior gentleman in Mesa, Arizona:
>
> Family, Friends, Neighbors, and former Classmates,
>
>
>
> I just found myself in the middle of a medical situation that made it
> very clear that "the Affordable Care Act" is neither affordable, nor
> do they care.
>
> I'll go back about seven years ago to a fairly radical prostate surgery
> that I underwent. The Urologist who performed the surgery was very
> concerned that it was cancer, though I wasn't told this until the lab
> report revealed it was benign. Since that procedure, I have experienced
> numerous urinary tract infections, UTI's. Since I had never had a
> "UTI" prior to the prostate surgery, I assumed that it is one of the
> side effects from surgery, an assumption since confirmed by my Family
> Doctor.
>
> The weekend of March 8-9, I was experiencing all the symptoms of
> another UTI. By Monday afternoon the infection had hit with full
> force. Knowing that all I needed was an antibiotic, I went to an
> Urgent Care Center in Mesa, AZ, to provide a specimen a requirement for
> getting the prescription. After waiting 45 minutes to see the Doctor,
> I started getting very nauseous and light headed. I went to the
> Receptionist to ask where the bathroom was, as I felt that I was
> going to throw up. I was told that I would have to wait for the
> Doctor because I would have to leave a specimen and they didn't want me
> in the bathroom without first seeing him. That was when the lights
> went out. My next awareness was that of finding myself on the floor (in
> the waiting room) having violent dry heaves, and very confused. At
> this point, I tried to stand up but couldn't make it, and they made it
> very clear they weren't going to let me get up until the ambulance got
> there. By the way, when you're waiting to see the Doctor and you pass
> out, you get very prompt attention.
>
>
> Now, "the rest of the story", and the reason for sending this to so
> many of you.
>
> I was taken to the nearest hospital, to emergency. Once there, I was
> transported to an emergency examination room. Once I had removed my
> clothes and donned one of those lovely hospital gowns, I finally got to
> see a Doctor. I asked "what is going on? I'm just having a UTI. Just
> get me the proper medication and let me go home." He told me that my
> symptoms presented the possibility of sepsis, a potentially deadly
> migration of toxins, and that they needed to run several tests to
> determine how far the infection had migrated.
>
> For the next 3 hours I was subjected to several tests, blood draws,
> EKG's, and demands for specimens. At about 7:30 the nurse came back to
> my room to inform me that one of the tests takes 1- 2 days to complete.
>
> I asked if they (the results) could be emailed, at which point she
> informed me that I wouldn't need them emailed because I wasn't going
> anywhere. I did tell her I wanted to see the doctor because I had no
> intention of staying overnight.
>
> Now, this is what I want each of you to understand. Please read these
> next sentences carefully.
>
> The doctor finally came in to inform me that he was going to admit me.
> I said, "Are you admitting me for treatment or for observation?" He
> told me that I would be admitted for observation. I said, "Doctor,
> correct me if I'm wrong, but if you admit me for observation, my
> Medicare will not pay anything. This due to the Affordable Care
> Act." He said, "That's right, it won't." I grabbed my bag of
> clothing and said, "Then I'm going home." He said you're really too
> sick to be going home, but I understand your position. This health
> program is going to hit seniors especially hard.
>
>
> The doctor then left the room and I started getting dressed. I was
> just getting ready to put my shoes on when another doctor (the closer)
> came into the room. He saw me dressed and said, "Where do you think you
> are going?" I simply said "I'm going home." To which he replied,
> quite vociferously, "No you aren't." I said, "Doc, you and I both know
> that under the "Affordable Care Act" anyone on Medicare who is admitted
> to a hospital for observation will be responsible for the bill.
> Medicare won't pay a cent." At which point he nodded in affirmation.
> I said, "You will either admit me for a specific treatment or you won't
> admit me." Realizing he wasn't going to win this one, he said he would
> prepare my release papers.
>
> A few minutes later, the discharge nurse came to my room to have me
> sign the necessary papers, relieving them from any responsibility. I
> told her I wasn't trying to be obstinate, but I wasn't going to be
> burdened with the full (financial) responsibility for my hospital
> stay. After making sure the door was closed, she said, "I don't blame
> you at all, I would do the same thing." She went on to say, "You
> wouldn't believe the people who elect to leave for the same reasons,
> people who are deathly sick, people who have to be wheeled out on a
> gurney."
>
> She further said, "The 'Affordable Care Act' is going to be a disaster
> for seniors. Yet, if you are in this country illegally, and have no
> coverage, you will be covered in full." This is not internet hype
> folks, this is real. I just experienced it personally.
>
>
> Moving right along, this gets worse.
>
>
> Today I went to a (required) follow up appointment with my Arizona
> Family Practitioner. Since my white count was pretty high, the follow
> up was important. During the visit, I shared the experience at
> emergency, and that I had refused to be admitted. His response was "I
> don't blame you at all, I would have done the same thing."
>
> He went on to say that the colonoscopy and other procedures are
> probably going to be dropped from coverage for those over 70." I told
> him that I had heard that the "Affordable Care Act" would no longer pay
> for cancer treatment for those 76 and older, is that true? His
> understanding is that it is true. The more I hear, and experience
> the Affordable Care Act, the more I'm beginning to see that we seniors
> are nothing more than an inconvenience, and the sooner they can get rid
> of us the better off they'll be.
>
> We can have an impact on this debacle by letting everyone in Congress
> know that their responsibility is to the constituents, not the
> president and not the lobbyists. We need to let them ALL know that
> they are in office to serve and to look after the BEST INTERESTS of "we
> the people," their employers, and not to become self serving
> bureaucrats who serve only out of greed. And if they don't seem to
> understand this simple logic, we'll fire them.
>
>
> REMEMBER:
>
> Demand your hospital admission is for TREATMENT and NOT for
> OBSERVATION! Don't believe this? Ask your doctor.
>
>
>
> SEND THIS TO EVERY SENIOR AND ALL MILITARY (ACTIVE OR VET) AND LET THEM
> KNOW THIS IS HOW OUR REPRESENTATIVES ON CAPITOL HILL TREAT THOSE WHO
> RISK IT ALL SO THEY CAN SIT UP THERE AND ENJOY ALL THE BENEFITS THEY
> EXEMPT FROM THE REST OF US.
>

PLAGUE?

A Special Offer from Health Sciences Institute Attention US Citizens: Documents from the American Medical Association reveal they expect aMAN-MADE PLAGUE to kill 106,000 Americans in 2015. This is an urgent warning and is not being reported by most mainstream media. In fact, the plague has already begun in many parts of America. Now, to learn how to protect your family, please click here for this informational presentation. Again, this man-made plague is known to our own US Government and manyresearch organizations... and will kill more than 100,000 Americans in 2015.The full details are right here. Please, do not delay. Get the plague warning here. --Kelly O'Donnell, HSI P.S. They are predicting this plague could kill an American citizen every 5 minutes at its peak. Please protect yourself by going here.

Copyright (c)2004-2015 by NewMarket Health Publishing. The products promoted in this material are not necessarily endorsed by Dr. Mark Stengler. The information provided should not be construed as personal medical advice or instruction. No action should be taken based solely on the contents of this site. Readers should consult appropriate health professionals on any matter relating to their health and well-being. Please note: We sent this e-mail to: hankkroll@gmail.com because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving special offers from Health Revelations… click here to unsubscribe To manage your subscription by mail or for any other subscription issues, write us at: Order Processing Center Attn: Customer Service P.O. Box 925 Frederick, MD 21705 USA

LIVE TO AGE 200 and beyond...

The article I recently found recently may be the answer to the chronic diseases we are experiencing in this country.

Twenty-five years ago I wrote a book titled PHILOSOPHERS STONE. Its about bypassing the plant to take the trace minerals and ORMES out of certain soils that contain a lot of the trace minerals. Soils around the Phoenix Arizona and the Middle East areas used to be covered with an ocean at one time and the sea water evaporated leaving all the minerals and ORMES in the soil. Its the same process that plants use to take minerals out of the soil to grow. You're just bypassing the plant and you don't have to wait several months for your garden to grow. The ancient peoples did it by boiling the dirt in alkaline spring water for six days and then reducing the ph with vinegar. It explains it in the book...  

You can also use the recipes in my book to take the minerals out of Dead Sea salt, sea water, granite powder and especially limestone that was grown in shallow seas by plants. The technology has been around for thousands of years and my book contains some of the history and use of the white-powder-of-gold as as its known today ORMUS or ORMES, (orbitally rearranged monatomic elements). 

My book, Philosophers Stone contains six recipes developed by Pfizer Pharmaceutical. It only cost $15.00 and can be ordered by calling 1-877-buy book, or by going to my web sites: www.GuardDogBooks.com and or www.AlaskaPublishing.com and clicking on the picture of the book.    

Can we live to be 200 but feel and look like 21? This doctor says Yes! Commentary by G. Edward Griffin Some people think Dr. Ed Park is crazy. I guess that makes me crazy, too, because I think he might be right ˗ and, if he is right, I want to be in on it. I met Dr. Park as a result of reading an article on the new science of age reversal. Yes, you read that correctly. I didn't say slowing. I said reversal. Before getting into the story, I must tell you that this report is a bit long. That's because there are so many mind-boggling issues that almost every statement will raise questions, and I would rather try to answer them as we go instead of publishing a shorter version and then having to answer questions by email forevermore. THE QUEST FOR AGE REVERSAL In the last twenty years, there has been a surge of research into the mechanism of cellular aging with the intent of finding ways to reverse the process. This seemingly impossible goal turns out to be less impossible than one might expect when we consider that, in our bodies, there already are cells (called stem cells) that never age. Stem cells have the capacity, not only to replace themselves should they become damaged, but they also are the parent cells that produce all other cells. They can create any type of cell that needs to be repaired or replaced, anything from skin to heart muscle to liver. In the early stages of pregnancy, the most fundamental type of stem cells, called diploid totipotent cells, divide and subdivide to create the entire embryo. They carry within them the entire genetic code for all cells and organs. IMMORTAL CELLS There is reason to believe that stem cells can live indefinitely. In one experiment, cultures of these cells, which are nourished in a laboratory petri dish, are still alive after seventy years with no signs of aging. Scientists refer to these as immortal cells. Most of our cells, although produced from stem cells, are not stem cells themselves and, therefore, are subject to aging. When muscles, nerves, and vital organs finally wear out, stem cells die also, not because they have grown old, but because they are no longer nourished by the rest of the body. Normal cells wear out and replace themselves, on average, about every seven years. In the early stages of life, their replicas are nearly identical to the originals but, with the passage of time, the replicas become less vigorous and acquire flaws. Hair turns grey or falls out, skin becomes wrinkled, muscles atrophy, and organs lose efficiency. It's called aging. CHROMOSOMES, DNA, AND TELOMERESTo understand why this occurs, we must know that all cells hold strands ofDNA that provide biological instructions for the cell's function. At the tips of chromosomes are small structures, like plastic caps at the ends of shoelaces, that protect them from unraveling and fusing with other chromosomes. These protective structures are called telomeres. Every time a normal cell replicates itself, the new cell is a complete copy of the old one ˗ with one exception: The telomeres in the new cells are slightly shorter than in the previous version. There are only so many times cells can replace themselves before telomeres become so short they can no longer protect the chromosomes. When that happens, chromosomes begin to deteriorate, make imperfect copies, and eventually fail to replicate. It is as though there is a built-in expiration date, and many have assumed that there is nothing we can do about it. When you're out of telomeres, your time is up. WHY DO STEM CELLS GROW TELOMERES BUT OTHER CELLS DON'T? The quest, therefore, has been to discover what it is about stem cells that allows them to keep their long telomeres regardless of how many times they replace themselves. Could that process be made to happen also in normal cells and, if so, would they, too, become immortal? The first part of that question was answered in 2009 when the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded to Elizabeth Blackburn, Carol Greider, and Jack Szostak for their discovery of the mechanism by which cells make copies of themselves. (See Nobel Prize press release here.) They demonstrated that telomere growth is stimulated by an enzyme called telomerase, and that the reason stem cells preserve their telomere length indefinitely is that they produce this enzyme, but normal cells do not. Finally, the mechanism was understood. The next task was to put telomerase into normal cells to see if they, too, will re-grow telomeres and become immortal. The challenge was how to get telomerase into normal cells. THE SOLUTION WAS FOUND IN NATURE Actually, the solution was already known. In 2007, the research team at Sierra Sciences, under the direction of Dr. Bill Andrews, succeeded in isolating a single molecule from the root of an herbal plant called Atragalus Membranaceus (also known as Astragalus Propinquus) that eliminates the need to deliver telomerase throughout the body, because it activates normal cells to produce their own telomerase on the spot. In other words, it causes normal cells to mimic stem cells in this regard. Amazing! A telomerase activator was found in nature. PROOF OF CONCEPT So, does it actually work according to theory? The evidence so far is impressive. In his book, Curing Aging*, doctor Andrews described the following studies: ► In 1990, scientists at the Geron Corporation found that adding telomerase to human cells "produced a line of cells that was able to divide indefinitely... [and] did not show any signs of losing growth control." (p. 49) ► "In 1999, researchers at the Dana Farber Cancer Institute ... produced mice with telomeres short enough to show many of the classic hallmarks of human aging: graying hair, frailness, spontaneous malignancies, and a reduced capacity for wound healing. This indicated clearly that these classic symptoms of aging are the result of telomere shortening in humans, and that our 'natural aging process' had its roots in short telomeres." (pp. 49, 50) ► "In 2000, Geron Corporation ... cultured human skin cells... so their telomeres would be as short as those of the elderly. ... As expected, the skin showed the hallmarks of 'old' skin, such as fragility and subepidermal blistering. It looked, to the naked eye, like the skin of an elderly person. The team then added the telomerase gene to a second batch of the old skin cells. ... The telomerized skin visually resembled young skin and it also shared the same gene expression profile as the young skin. By all available measurements, telomerizing the skin had actually reversed the aging of the skin itself." (p. 50.) ► "In 2003, a team at the University of Utah ... found that the mortality rate of individuals with shorter telomeres was nearly twice as high as those with longer telomeres, and that mortality as a result of heart disease was over three times higher in individuals with shorter telomeres. This provided solid evidence of a correlation between telomere shortening and death from old age or age-related diseases in humans." (pp. 51, 52) ► In November 2010, a team of scientists at Harvard Medical School altered the telomerase gene in a group of mice so that telomeres became short enough to display human-like symptoms of aging. Then they activated the production of telomerase within their cells. "This treatment successfully decreased the abundance of cells with critically short telomeres in these mice and caused a 33% increase in telomere length. More significantly, it allowed resumption of cell proliferation and eliminated the symptoms of degeneration across multiple organs, including the testes, spleens, and intestines. The mice experienced a restoration of fertility, of spleen size, of sense of smell, and of brain size and function. These were results that, if seen in elderly humans, would constitute successful reversal of the aging process." (pp. 52, 53) LIFE EXTENSION MAGAZINE WEIGHS IN The following summary of the Harvard study was published in the April, 2011, edition of Life Extension Magazine: After only 30 days, there was a reversal of the degenerative changes in every system the researchers tested. The brains of the treated mice, not only started growing new neurons, but began to thicken the protective myelin sheath surrounding existing neurons. As one of the researches was quoted, they were able to "reverse neurodegeneration." The treated mice produced new viable sperm, their spleen atrophy and intestinal damage were reversed, and even their sense of smell was restored (indicating restored olfactory function in their brains). ... In humans, this would be like restoring the health and vigor of a sickly 80-year-old to that of a young adult! Incidentally, there is a blood test for measuring telomere length, and it has been shown conclusively that patients who undertake telomerase activation therapy, experience a significant increase in the length of their telomeres BUT DOES IT WORK WITH HUMANS? Very impressive, indeed, but forget petri dishes, mouse studies, and blood tests. Does telomerase activation extend the lifespan of humans? The answer is that it is too soon to know for sure. It has been theorized that users might grow one day younger for each day of use. It could take ten years to knock off ten years from one's biological age, and it probably will take that long to know for sure if longer telomeres really equate to longer human lifespan. In the meantime, users report deeper sleep with vivid dreams, better energy and stamina, elevated mood, and mental clarity. Those who have been users for more than a few months often report improvement in skin color, reduction in wrinkles, fading of age spots, and darkening of hair. Bear in mind, however, that these are anecdotal reports. There have been no controlled studies so far. In fact, there may never be any, because this comes from nature and cannot be patented. Manufacturers will not spend millions of dollars for controlled studies when competitors can benefit without bearing any of the cost. It may take years before the empirical evidence will tell us for sure if human age reversal is really happening. CAN ONLY THE SUPER WEALTHY AFFORD THIS? The telomerase-activator was developed by Geron Corporation and branded as TA65. It became available in 2005 for those with deep pockets. In the beginning, a year's supply cost $25,000 plus travel to New York. Since then, the price has fallen dramatically, but is still beyond the reach of most people. Currently, a 90-capsule bottle of TA65 sells for $500. But do not despair. A chemical analysis by The American Analytical Chemistry Laboratories in Champaign, IL, showed that more than 95% of TA65 is Cyloastragenol, which is the technical name for the unique molecule found to be the telomerase activator. Since then, other producers have entered the market with what they claim is the generic form of TA65 at lower cost. But here is where the plot thickens. At this early phase of development, there is considerable confusion regarding the quality, purity, and even the identity of what is in these brands. The lowest Internet price is attached to a product made in China, and there is some question about what really is in the bottle. Health food stores sell various brands of Astragalus, the herb from which Cycloastagenol is taken, but that is not even close to the substance that activates telomerase. It is merely the ground up root. Some products claim they contain Astragalus extracts, some as high as 25:1 concentration, but that still is not Cycloastragenol. I am told that it would take bushels of these herbal products to produce thirty tablets of the real thing. ENTER, DR. PARK Which brings us back to Dr. Park. When I decided to try TA65, I searched the Internet for a reliable source and found that, not only was he one of those first users I mentioned previously, but he was the first medical doctor to use telomerase activation in his practice, so I purchased my first supply from him and, soon thereafter, met him in person. Ed Park, MD, is an expert on telomerase activation. In 1989, he graduated from Harvard University with a BA degree in Biological Anthropology. In 1993, he received his MD degree from Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, and a Master's degree in Public Health also from Columbia. In 1997, he completed internship and residency at Beth Israel Hospital, a teaching hospital of the Harvard Medical School. He is the author of Telomere Timebombs,** and his private practice is located in Costa Mesa, California. MY INTERVIEW WITH DR. PARK To provide further information about this topic, we produced a video interview with Dr. Park entitled The New Science of Age Reversal. The 40-minute DVD is sold at The Reality Zone here, but we also made a shorter version just for this announcement. It can be viewed for free here. I was delighted to learn that Dr. Park, building on what he has learned about anti-aging, has crafted his own nutriceutical, called Recharge, and that the price is significantly lower. Because of his knowledge in this field, I have confidence in the quality of his product, so I decided to tell everyone about it and add it to our online store. The price is still quite steep but it keeps coming down and, as the user base grows, that trend surely will continue. WAIT AND SEE ˗ OR TAKE THE PLUNGE? To be on the frugal and cautious side, it makes sense to wait a few years for the price to drop further and to see if users really experience unmistakable age reversal. However, if you are like I am, you may decide that waiting is too expensive in terms of continued aging and lost opportunity to beat the clock. Will this really work? Frankly, I don't know, but the science is sound, and I think it could. For my part, I would hate to find out that it does but I missed the boat. * Bill Andrews, PhD, Curing Aging (Reno, Nevada, Sierra Sciences: 2014) ** Ed Park, MD, Telomere Timebombs; Defusing the Terror of Aging (Costa Mesa, California, Telomere Timebombs Publishing: 2013) ******* The label recommends taking 1 to 5 capsules daily, preferably at bedtime, along with a fatty bedtime snack or after a fatty evening meal. Cellular regeneration is more active during sleep, and fats improve absorption. FREE BONUS WITH AUTO-SHIP A free DVD of The New Science of Age Reversal, the full interview of Dr. Park by G. Edward Griffin, will be sent to those who select the auto-ship option. Recharge HP03T_single_bottle_30capsules$129.00

		HP03T_per_bottle_if_order_2_or_more$109.00

		AUTOSHIP: The quantity you enter for your initial order will be sent immediately. After that, the same quantity will be shipped to arrive at approximately the same time of the month that you received your first shipment. If you would like an autoship quantity different from the initial order or if you want it to arrive at a different time of the month, please specify in the comment section of the order form. HP03T_per_bottle_if_autoship_any_quantiy$97.00

If the 2-or-more quantity price is selected but only one bottle is ordered, the single-bottle price will apply even though the discount appears in the shopping cart. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Does Cycloastragenol cause cancer?  The cancer question was a theoretical concern in the beginning, because one of the characteristics of cancer cells is that they produce telomerase, and it was theorized that anything that activates the production of telomerase might, thereby, cause normal cells to become cancer. Now that the product has been used for almost ten years, that speculation has been disproved. There are no reports of cancer occurring or being aggravated by Cycloastragenol. In fact, just the opposite has been the case. Cancers have gone into remission after taking Cycloastragenol. Studies have shown that those with longer telomeres are much less likely to develop cancer than those with short telomeres, and some researchers now are viewing telomerase activators, not only as agents for age reversal but also for cancer therapy. The following references on this topic are recommended: Curing Aging, by Bill Andrews, Ph.D., pp. 58-63. Telomere Timebombs, by Ed Park, M.D., pp. 78, 164. Is there any toxicity associated with Cycloastragenol?  Since products found in nature cannot be patented, there is no motivation for companies to spend the millions of dollars required to conduct FDA-approved tests for toxicity, because their competitors then could ride on the back of their research without contributing to its cost. So, there have been no definitive tests that deal with this question. However, after more than ten years of actual use by thousands of individuals, many of whom are in the medical profession, there have been no reports of toxicity or any other negative side effects. The worst complaint I have seen after scouring the literature is that, in some cases, people occasionally wake up in the middle of the night, fully alert, ready to start the day, but then have no trouble going back to sleep again. That's it. Cycloastagenol appears to be about as non-toxic as anything can be. Nevertheless, it is just common sense not to exceed recommended dosage levels and to be alert to negative reactions, including those related to allergies. What are the ingredients in Recharge? Because the manufacturers of TA65 were the first to use Cycloastragenol for telomerase activation, they have taken the stance that this gives them an exclusive right to use those words. Therefore, Dr. Park has informed us he is concerned about legal action if he says that Recharge contains Cycloastragenol or that it works as a telomerase activator. Nevertheless, laboratory tests confirm that the primary ingredient is, indeed, Cycloastragenol (8mg, which is the same as in TA65). The Recharge label refers to this as Astragalus propinquus extract. Technically, that is correct, but Cycloastragenol is a very small (and very expensive) component ofAstragalus propinquus extract. Usually, the word extract refers only to a distillate of the source material (the root of the Astragalus plant) that is not even close to the high potency of pure Cycloastragenol. Dr. Park hopes to overcome this barrier eventually but, at present, there is a legal issue regarding what he can put on the label. He now takes Recharge instead of TA65, and so do I. At present, the label provides the following information:Astragalus propinquus extract, 8 mg.Curcuma longa extract, 34 mg. Ocimumtenuflorum, 21 mg. Rhodiola rosea, 13 mg. Is there any reason for young people to take a telomerase activator? There are two reasons for taking a telomerase activator. The one that has received the most publicity is to achieve age reversal. Those under the age of thirty or thirty-five may not be motivated by that purpose. The other reason is to increase resistance to chronic and communicable diseases. There is a proven correlation between telomere length and good health, even at younger ages. Would I have to take this product for the rest of my life? The process of telomere shortening and re-growing is a slow process. It takes many years to age, and it probably will take the same number to un-age. Having to consume the product for the rest of one's life begs the question of how long that life is. If you want to live for 200 years in good health,  you would be well advised to take this substance for as long as you want the effects it brings. However, if you decide that you have had enough of life and good health, you could simply stop taking it. Theoretically, that would put you back on the original track of telomere shortening and the gradual advance of old age. So the short answer is: No, you don't have to. Would it be dangerous to take this product for a while and then stop? I have no idea if this process could be turned on, then off, and then on again. Theoretically, it could, and I cannot think of any reason that doing so would be dangerous, but only time will tell. Is this product enough by itself for good health? Absolutely not. Young people become ill even with long telomeres. The body needs a wide spectrum of nutrients, micronutrients, nutritional co-factors, and clean air and water. Even fresh fruits and vegetables may not be enough, because most of them come from mineral-depleted soil, are soaked with toxic pesticides, or have been genetically modified. Don't abandon high quality supplements, exercise, and healthy lifestyle. Long telomeres are not enough.

Cordless phones cause Brain Tumors...

Court Ruling: Mobile & Cordless Phones Cause Brain Tumors | World Truth.TV

i

4 Votes

For the very first time, a supreme court has ruled that using mobile or cordless phones is directly linked to causing brain tumors, affirming what many scientists have been saying for years now about the dangers of cell phone radiation. The U.K.’s Telegraph reports that 60-year-old Innocente Marcolini, who developed a tumor in his trigeminal nerve, was ruled to have suffered this fate as a result of using his mobile handset for up to six hours every day for 12 years.

According to Italy’s Supreme Court in Rome, there is a “causal link” between Marcolini’s mobile phone use and the non-cancerous tumor that caused the entire left side of his face to become paralyzed. A respected oncologist and professor of environmental mutagenesis, Dr. Angelo Gino Levis, along with neurosurgeon Dr. Guiseppe Grasso, provided evidence at a recent trial showing that the electromagnetic radiation emitted from mobile and cordless phones damages cells.

“This is significant for very many people,” said Marcolini to reporters about his case’s ruling. “I wanted this problem to become public because many people still do not know the risks. I wanted it recognized that there was a link between my illness and the use of mobile phones and cordless phones,” he added, noting that he now has to take the extremely powerful painkiller morphine every single day just to cope with his the agony.

Though Marcolini’s brain tumor is non-cancerous, it still reportedly threatened to kill him because it had been encroaching on his carotid artery, which is the major blood vessel responsible for transporting blood to the brain. The tumor also developed directly next to where Marcolini typically held his phone next to his ear, illustrating how significantly mobile phone radiation can disrupt proper brain cell function.

Last year, the World Health Organization (WHO) ruled that mobile phone devices are a “Possible Human Carcinogen,” and added them to the Class 2B carcinogens list. Earlier this year, researchers out of Washington also came forward with research showing that cell phone radiation causes significant damage to DNA, which can lead to cancer.

“Today, there are more than two billion cell phone users being exposed every day to the dangers of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) — dangers government regulators and the cell phone industry refuse to admit exist,” wrote Sue Kovach in a 2007 Life Extension Magazine report. “Included are: genetic damage, brain dysfunction, brain tumors, and other conditions such as sleep disorders and headaches.”

Sources for this article include:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk

http://www.naturalnews.com

Court Ruling: Mobile & Cordless Phones Cause Brain Tumors | World Truth.TV.

Global Warming Hoax

THE GLOBAL WARMING HOAX

Societal manipulation didn’t start with the sinking of the Maine. Nor did it start with the surprise attack on Perl Harbor. It may have started with the invention of money or possibly the invention of religion and has been going thousands of years before Biblical times.

It takes a disaster of huge proportions like the demolition of the Trade Towers when Zionist, Larry Silverstein pulled the switch and a whole lot of media brainwashing to get people to sign their rights away with bills like Homeland Security and to get the people behind invading a third-world country with no ‘weapons of mass destruction.’

People are finally getting wise to the False Flag operations designed to rob us of our money and freedom. The pendulum will swing the other direction in November. The next big disaster will have to top all previous disaster. Get ready for a dirty bomb or possibly a nuclear attack on a major US city.

It may surprise you to learn that Enron chief Ken Lay and the CEO of British Petroleum (BP), John Browne, had a meeting in the White House in 1997, with Vice - President Al Gore and President Clinton. Their agenda was to insure that the US agreed to the Kyoto Protocols. Yes, you read that correctly. BP wanted the US to agree with to the Kyoto Protocols. Why? Such a compliance with the Protocols would have imposed major costs upon the US energy industry and all of those who use energy—a very large hidden tax. Both Enron and BP would have made billion from this hidden tax that would have been extracted from the American People.

Al Gore might thus be seen by many as the one who revealed a truth that the Bush administration was trying to hide. Indeed, for a long time, the fact that Bush was unwilling to endorse and ace upon global warming was seen as evidence that it had to be real! When it comes to climate change, Gore might be a far more evil villain than Bush!

            Dr. William Gray, a pioneer in the Science of seasonal hurricane forecasts, has argued that humans are not responsible for the warming of the Earth. “We’re brainwashing our children,” said Gray, a long-time professor at Colorado State University. “They’re going to the Gore movie and being fed all this. It’s ridiculous.” Gray does not deny the phenomenon, but instead argues that a natural cycle of ocean water temperatures—related to the amount of salt in ocean water—is responsible for the global warming that he acknowledges had taken place. However, he said, that same cycle means a period of global cooling will begin soon and last for several years. “We’ll look back on all this in ten or twenty years and realize how foolish it was.” Gray said. “The human impact on the atmosphere is simply too small to have a major effect on global temperatures.” He said, that his beliefs have made him an outsider in popular science. “It bother me that my fellow scientists are not speaking out against something they know is wrong.” He said. “But they also know that they’d never get any grants of they spoke out. I don’t care about grants.”

            This author has written on the propaganda of ‘CLIMATE CHANGE’ for human control now for five years. For some reason nobody will look up the fact that carbon dioxide is a trace gas making up only .033% of our atmosphere while nitrogen is 78% and oxygen 20%.

Water vapor from evaporation can make up to twenty percent of the weight of air by weight at 100% humidity. I know these things because I have installed evaporators on diesel engines to increase their efficiency. When inducted into a high compression engine 20 % of the weight of the air can instantly turn into steam making the engine burn cleaner and producing more horsepower.

The Earth is a self regulating organism in that when the temperature increases the amount of water vapor in the air (clouds) increases thereby reflecting more sunlight back into space cooling the Earth. Nobody knows how much water vapor is in the atmosphere at any given time.

Then there is the fact that Earth is recovering from a series of volcanic eruptions that started in the 1700’s. Each major volcanic eruption lowered global temperature .5 degrees.   

THE GLOBAL WARMING PROPONENT’S HOCKY STICK GRAPH

The graph has been subjected to manipulation. This graph was used by IPCC to further global warming propaganda. The graph was produced by modifying temperature data and proxies, and was generated by a computer algorithm to predict a future temperature rise. Detailed analysis of the data and the algorithm by Steve McIntyre          and environmental economist Dr. Ross McKitrick demonstrated very improper and unscientific conduct in the graph’s creation.

For example, the graph does not show the well-known warmer times of the Medieval Warm Period lived and farmed in Greenland for centuries. The chart also does not show the Little Ice Age, which extended from about 1350 to 1850 CE. The history of those times includes show falling in Paris in July, ice festivals held on four feet of ice on the Thames River in London, people walking from Denmark to Sewden across the frozen Baltic, as well as people walking from from Manhattan to New Jersey across the frozen New York Harbor.

What McIntyre and McKitrick found was that the algorithm could produce a “hockey stick”—shaped graph from a table of random numbers. No temperature data was necessary—proving that Al Gore’s statistics lie.

On December 6^th 2006, Geophysicist Dr. David Deming of the University of Oklahoma gave some telling testimony to the US Senate. He testified that, around the time that a paper of his was published in Science in 1995 he received an email from a prominent climate change researcher, stating: “We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.”

In 1998 Dr. Robinson, director of the Oregon Institute for Science and medicine posted his first global warming skeptics petition on the Institute’s web site. (www.oism.org). It eventually attracted more than 17,000 Americans with science degrees.

In late 2007, Robinson mailed a new copy of the petition tot the original signatories, asking them to recruit additional qualified scientists. Now his list includes around 31,500 man-made warming skeptics with science qualifications. More than 9.000 hold scientific PhDs. Almost 31,500 skeptics happen to me more than 12 times as many scientists as the 2,500 scientific reviewers claimed by the IPCC to form a scientific consensus.

Robinson’s petition states a truth: “There is no convincing scientific evidence that humans release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth.

Recently there have been warnings portending disaster because man threatens to melt much of the ice covering Greenland. But researchers reported in July 2007 that Greenland really was green a half-million years ago—covered with forests. Who or what was responsible for that warming trend?

The sad state of the matte is that our climate has been reduced to a debate about man-made carbon dioxide emissions, and this has bee reduced to a “cap and trade” system in which the problem is not seriously addressed, but politicians have come up with a means of taxing heavy polluters—often underdeveloped countries, whose infrastructure relies on old machinery and which, hence is polluting. Their plan is to arrest the industrial development of India and China. However, those of us who are operating outdated diesel engines that do not meet Tier 4 standards will be put out of business.

Alas, the fallacy of the science, upon which this new form of economy is meant to be based was shot from under their feet because of “Climategate”. It meant that the international politicians left the Danish capital without being able to announce their favorite new toy to manipulate the world economy. Will it continue to be played on in the field of International politics or will it silently fade away?

The question is, what will be their next big excuse to rob of us of our freedom and our labor?  www.GuardDogBooks.com

  

I have been on a quest to alter societal evolution into more benign directions with my books. My book, COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES explains how the carbon resources were made. Our sun is in a 105,000-year elliptical orbit around the Procyon and Sirius star systems. After reading about the direction our sun is traveling through space I plotted our course from Orion toward Hercules and in the process discovered that our Sun was captured and is till in orbit around the Sirius A and B which are only 8.5 light years away.

We are part of a cluster of 100 stars ruled by these two giants. Sirius B is a white Dwarf star of 1.5 earth diameters orbiting 20 earth distances from Sirius A. Every fifty-four years it gets so close to Sirius A that it feeds off from it several metric tons per hour causing it to put out thousands of times more invisible ultraviolet light than our sun. I am now convinced that the intense light from Sirius B is responsible for advanced multi-celled life forms on earth. It is the only thing that could break through a 750 PSI atmosphere extending 2,500 miles above the planet to get life started.

Our sun was born with about 40 other stars in an Orion dust cloud not too far from the Horse Head Nebula currently 1330 light years toward the center of the Galaxy (toward the Southeast). After our sun was born and most of the planets formed from dust rings we drifted out in the Orion Arm toward Hercules (northwest) for two+ billion years.

Galaxies make suns in dust clouds and send them out to make the body of the galaxy. After our sun was born and the earth formed from dust around the sun a billion years of volcanism gave earth a thick carbon dioxide atmosphere of 750 pounds per square inch. {The December Astronomy magazine mentions that early Earth had an atmosphere of 1,450 pounds per square inch and one third of that was carbon dioxide. Now Co2 is only .033 percent and the government is using this as an excuse to control us?}

Earth was about one-third smaller diameter at that time. After that, we (our sun) drifted out into the cold of space for a billion years and earth had an ice age that lasted one billion years. All the oceans were frozen. Our sun didn’t burn as hot as it does today.

After a billion years of being covered with ice, earth and our sun drifted between Procyon and Sirius A and B which are over a billion years older than our sun. These giant stars orbit each other at 8 to 12 earth distances (AU) and each have about 8 times more gravity than our sun. When little, Sirius B orbiting Sirius A every 54 years came around, it grabbed hold of our sun and pulled it into orbit around Sirius A because they have 12 times more gravity than our sun. This was fortunate for us because the light and heat from these giant stars melted the ice on earth and started plants to grow in the oceans thereby releasing free oxygen.

For the next 700-million years there were no ice caps on Earth and tropical plants grew at the poles because we had light coming in from many directions 24-hours a day.

Our fortunate capture by the Sirius system happened about 750 million years ago and was the beginning of all complex multi-cellular life forms on earth. During the Carboniferous Era the intense UV light from Sirius B laid down limestone layers up to 12,500 feet thick. (The 3.8 solar mass binary star system Sirius A & B is 8 light years to the south and is the brightest star in the sky. We are heading toward it right now at 7.5 kilometers per second are in orbit around it. In my book, COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES we do the math to concur that our orbit period exactly matches the last ICE AGE cycle.  The continental United States from the Rocky Mountains to the Carolinas was laid down at time with limestone layers on average over 2,500 feet thick. [Look up Carboniferous Era in Encyclopedia Britannica.] Carbon removed from the atmosphere during that era was laid down in Pennsylvania and Virginia as coal layers up to a hundred feet thick.

Coal is made from grass and trees and plants. Anthracite or hard coal is compressed from plant matter at a ration of 40 to 1. Soft coal is compressed down at a ration of about 20 to 1. The point is, coal, oil, and limestone are made from carbon dioxide using photosynthesis and ultraviolet light from space and the majority of it came from Sirius B. Three million years ago an explosion went off in Orion creating banard’s Loop. After that time our solar system went into an elliptical orbit and Earth started to have small ice caps for the first time in 700-million years.

We are now in a 105,000 elliptical orbit where we go out to nine light years and practically stop. At present we are 8.5 light years and heading back toward Sirius at 7.5 kilometers per second. Our orbit period is 105,000 years which directly corresponds with the current Ice Age cycle.

Our sun does not have enough power to keep us out of the ice ages otherwise we wouldn’t have them! If you want to know more please read my book. Go www.alaskapublishing.com or www.GuardDogBooks.com or www.Trafford.com/books Type in COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES.

Earth is loosing its atmosphere. We have a limited time on earth. During Biblical times the Oxygen was 35%. Reference books list it as 20% but it is down to about 18% yet we go on burning things? At the time of the dinosaurs the atmospheric pressure was around 30 to 60 pounds per square inch. Now it is down to 14.5 pounds per square inch. Before our sun was captured by the Sirius system earth had an atmosphere of 750 pounds per square inch. Over time and it was laid down as limestone, coal and oil using photosynthesis in the oceans and light from these stars. We have a limited time to get our act together and get off the planet so that we can seed life in other biospheres.

BIGGEST THREATS TO HUMANS ON THE PLANET.

Here in Alaska we have lost a 60+ million dollar a year crab fishery in lower Cook Inlet that went directly into the pockets of the common folk and nobody seems to understand or care. Between the EXXON VALDEZ oil spill and the ongoing oil tanker discharges is a wonder we have any fishery at all.

Discharges of oil from shipping, offshore extraction of oil, and transport of oil in pipelines is the result of either accidents or "normal", deliberate operational discharges. Accidental discharges (oil spills) occur when vessels collide or come in distress at sea (engine breakdown, fire, explosion) and break open, or run aground close to the shore, or when there is a blowout of an offshore oil well, or when a pipeline breaks. Much can be done to avoid accidents, but there will always be unfortunate circumstances and situations that cause accidents to happen. Operational discharges, on the other hand, are mostly deliberate and "routine", and can to a very large extent be effectively controlled and avoided. It is much a question combining available technical solutions with information, education and a change of attitude among ship-owners, mariners, offshore platform and pipeline operators.

---

FROM SHIPS

Ship-related operational discharges of oil include the discharge of bilge water from machinery spaces, fuel oil sludge, and oily ballast water from fuel tanks. Also other commercial vessels than tankers contribute operational discharges of oil from machinery spaces to the sea. Cargo-related operational discharges from tankers include the discharge of tank-washing residues and oily ballast water.
Before international regulations were introduced to prevent oil pollution from ships, the normal practice for oil tankers was to wash out the cargo tanks with water and then pump the resulting mixture of oil and water into the sea. Also, oil cargo or fuel tanks were used for ballast water and, consequently, oil was discharged into the sea when tankers flushed out the oil-contaminated ballast water to replace it with new oil.

• Crude oil washing systems (COW) means that the cargo tanks, where tankers carry the oil they transport, are cleaned by means of high-pressure flushing with crude oil ("oil to remove oil") or crude oil plus water. This reduces the quantity of oil remaining on board after discharge. The residues from such tank washing are pumped into slop tanks and left in a reception facility in port.
• Segregated ballast tanks (SBT). Ballast water is taken on board to maintain stability, such as when a vessel is sailing empty to pick up cargo or after having unloaded cargo. Ballast water contained in segregated ballast tanks never come into contact with either cargo oil or fuel oil.
• Clean ballast tanks. To have so-called dedicated clean ballast tanks (CBT) means that specific cargo tanks are dedicated to carry ballast water only.
• Operational oil separation and filtering equipment with an automatic stopping device. Bilge water is produced when the machinery spaces of a vessel are cleaned. Leaking cooling water often becomes contaminated with fuel oils and lubricant oils. Vessels in operation produce oil-contaminated bilge water to a variable extent. With the right equipment on board, dirty bilge water can be processed in a way that separates most of the oil from the water before it is discharged into the sea. If the oil content exceeds the limit, the discharge is automatically stopped (bilge alarm).

In a sea area with Special Area status under the international MARPOL Convention Annex I (so far, only the Mediterranean Sea area, the Baltic Sea area, the Red Sea area, the Gulf of Aden area, the Antarctic area, and the North West European waters) , it is altogether forbidden for oil tankers to discharge oil, oily sludge and oil-contaminated residues from tank washing, or heavily oil-contaminated ballast water. All oily wastes (mixtures) must be kept on board and stored in so-called slop tanks until the vessel reaches a reception facility in port. Furthermore, it is not allowed to discharge bilge water unless it has been properly cleaned and contains no more than 15 mg of oil per litre.
Most sea areas are not Special Areas, but in accordance with international regulations under MARPOL, attempts are nevertheless made to make large oil tankers and product carriers have equipment for crude oil washing and segregated ballast tanks. According to MARPOL Annex I, adopted in 1978, all new crude oil tankers of 20,000 dwt and above, and all new product carriers (30,000 dwt and above), must have SBT. Existing tankers over 40,000 dwt must be fitted either with SBT or with COW systems. For an interim period it was also allowed for some tankers to use CBT.
All oil tankers and other large vessels must be fitted with the equipment described above for bilge water cleaning. However, it has been emphasized that bilge water also contains traces of detergents used in the cleaning process. When mixed, the residues of oil and detergents form a stable emulsion with another density than oil. This sometimes milk-like but highly oil-contaminated mixture is not always "recognized" by the separation and filtering equipment, and thus discharged into the sea.

---

FROM OFFSHORE DRILLING:

Operational discharges in the offshore exploration for and extraction of oil and natural gas include operational wastes, such as drilling fluids/drilling muds, produced formation waters and formation cuttings, and machinery space discharges.
During drilling, specially formulated drilling fluids/drilling muds are used to cool and lubricate the drill bit, control pressure and bring the cuttings (rock or sand from a borehole) back to the surface. The mud is pumped down the drill pipe and into the hole at high velocity through nozzles in the drill bit. Drilling muds are usually a mixture of water, clay, a weighting material (usually barite), and various chemicals. Drilling muds are most commonly based on water (WBM), but in some cases mineral oil (OBM) or synthetics (SBM) is believed to be more biodegradable. Although the use of WBM is preferred, sometimes OBM or SBM has to be used when drilling conditions are more difficult. Inevitably, when drilling with OBM, rock cuttings are contaminated with oil from the muds. In the past when working offshore, these cuttings were often discharged into sea, in accordance with local regulation. Where OBM is used offshore, the spent mud and cuttings are now re-injected or transported to shore for treatment and disposal, or recycling. (The fluid is recycled through a circulation system where equipment mounted on the drilling rig separates out the drill cuttings and allows the clean fluid to be pumped back down into the hole.) The objective of environmental management of drilling operations is to attempt to minimise the potential environmental impacts (see APPEA and OEF).
Where one finds oil, one often also finds water. The water is either naturally present or has been injected into the reservoir to maintain pressure for production. The proportion of water produced increases as the oil field matures. As oil is drawn from a reservoir, it is therefore necessary to separate the water and return it to the ocean. This is what is known as produced formation water (PFW). Great emphasis is placed on ensuring that the water returned to the ocean is as free as possible from oil and chemicals. Strict regulations apply on how much petroleum hydrocarbon is contained in PFW. The objective of environmental management of produced water is to reduce the quantity and to improve the quality of discharged produced water (see APPEA and OEF).
As an oil well is drilled, the drill cuttings, consisted of crushed rock and clay, are brought to the surface by the drilling fluid/drilling mud and discharged overboard. New measures to reduce discharges, such as re-injecting the cuttings into the well, and slim hole drilling, are being examined and tested by the industry (see APPEA). According to Statoil, it ranks today as a tried and tested technology.
Similar to the bilge water from machinery spaces in ships, oil platform machinery space drainage is an oil-containing mixture. Operational oil separation and filtering equipment is thus needed to clean the drainage before it is discharged into the sea. If such equipment is not installed, the oily drainage should be kept on board until it can be transported to a reception facility.

---

FROM OFFSHORE PIPELINES:

There is no certain figure of how many miles of offshore pipelines there is in the world today. One estimation, published in the 2002 U.S. National Research Council (NRC) report, is 82,748 miles (about 52,000 kilometres) of pipelines. Operational discharges from offshore oil pipelines usually consist of chemical discharges during construction, hydrostatic testing, commissioning, pigging, and maintenance of the pipeline systems. Pipeline discharges usually contain corrosion and scale inhibitors, biocides, oxygen scavengers, and other agents. However, pipelines can also continuously leak oil in small quantities, although the line is intact. (When a pipeline breaks, however, the spill will be an acute one, like any other accidental oil spill.) Technical systems to detect and locate such smaller leaks are required as a means to avoid discharge of oil into the marine environment — as well as to save money for the pipeline operator.