Showing posts with label Amazon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amazon. Show all posts

Friday, February 5, 2016

Bloddy History

Our bloody History
The King James Bible was written in such a way that the 'King' was more powerful than God. Anyone caught with another type of Bible in their home was severely punished (tortured) and then executed.
Wikipedia: “The King James Version (KJV), also known as the Authorized Version (AV) or King James Bible (KJB), is an English translation of the Christian Bible for the Church of England that began in 1604 and was completed in 1611.[a]
First printed by the King's Printer Robert Barker, this was the third translation into English to be approved by the English Church authorities. The first was the Great Bible commissioned in the reign of King Henry VIII (1535), and the second was the Bishops' Bible of 1568.[3] In January 1604, James I convened the Hampton Court Conference where a new English version was conceived in response to the perceived problems of the earlier translations as detected by the Puritans, a faction within the Church of England. The translation is widely considered a towering achievement in English literature, as both beautiful and scholarly.
James gave the translators instructions intended to guarantee that the new version would conform to the ecclesiology and reflect the episcopal structure of the Church of England and its belief in an ordained clergy. The translation was done by 47 scholars, all of whom were members of the Church of England. 
In common with most other translations of the period, the New Testament was translated from Greek, the Old Testament was translated from Hebrew and Aramaic text, while the Apocrypha was translated from the Greek and Latin. In the Book of Common Prayer (1662), the text of the Authorized Version replaced the text of the Great Bible – for Epistle and Gospel readings (but not for the Psalter which has retained substantially Coverdale's Great Bible version) and as such was authorized by Act of Parliament.
The historic text inside my giant Bible mentions the Council of Nicaea 350 AD. The Greeks couldn't read the ancient Hebrew history writings so they hired fifty learned Hebrews to translate the old Hebrew into Greek. Due to the age of the ancient manuscripts and the fact that some of the words were forgotten some of the words were miss-translated. For example in Genesis Nephilim is a plural word. They also left out many of the books dealing with women to keep them subjugated and minimize their role in the church. Only certain learned men were taught to read and write although women had played a large part in early history up to that point in time.
Any mention of ET's, like in the Book of Enoch especially where men were taken up into Heaven was left out of what later became known as the Bible. They didn’t want mankind to know his true origins because it would take power away from the church. The Church had to maintain control over the populations and the various governments at the time. They were the middleman controlling all interactions between humanity and the higher powers. Anyone who heard voices or practiced divinization was deemed a witch and burned at the stake—especially those who had property that could be appropriated by the church.
According to Zechariah Sitchin’s translation of ancient Sumerian scrolls, ‘the gods came to earth 432,000 years before the deluge’. He writes in THE LOST RELMS: “The Anunnaki, the Sumerians wrote upon numerous clay tablets, had come to Earth long before the Deluge. In The 12th Planet we determined that it happened 432,000 years before the Deluge—a period equivalent to 120 orbits of Nibiru, orbits that though the Anunnaki represent but a single year of theirs are the equivalent to 3,600 Earth-years. They came and went between Nibiru and Earth each time their planet came closer to the Sun (and Earth) as it passed between Jupiter and Mars; and there is no doubt whatsoever that the Sumerians began o observe the heavens not to know when to sow, but in order to see and celebrate the return of the celestial Lords.”        
There were many ET Gods that came here to mine gold more than 432,000 years ago. They use the gold for life extension, not climate modification. They burn it into the white powder at 2,800 degrees F. known as ORME gold; (orbitally rearranged monatomic elements) and put it in their unleavened priest bread. The platinum group metals in the ORME state play an important in that they increase intelligence. ORME Rhodium quadruples the efficiency of brain synapse and other cognitive functions and it has non-local properties. You can telepathically converse with others and distance is no hindrance as the communication is instantaneous to other planets and galaxies.
Due to its physical shape, like little galaxies, ORMES reproduces magnetic frequency with no loss of power. Simply put little magnets above sumps. Put little valves at the bottom and use it to water your plants. They will grow twice as fast. You can use this knowledge to take out of your well water and other liquids. It is a perfect insulator yet it fits the technical definition of a room-temperature superconductor in that it magnetically resonates with no loss of power.  It was carried in the Ark of the Covenant that Moses took from Egypt is a Faraday cage designed to carry ORMES. ORMES has to be kept in a glass container surrounded by steel wool and a metal can to keep it from leaking through the glass. You also to keep it in the refrigerator as it is an ideal growing medium.
ORME gold is used to increase energy in the cells during cell division thus correcting the DNA and winding it up tighter to increasing the number of base pairs per turn. When you were conceived you had fifty base pairs per turn and your cells divide very quickly. When you were born you had 25 base pairs per turn and cell replication started slowing down. At age twenty you had twenty base pairs per turn of DNA and your cell loss equals cell reproduction. At age fifty you have five base pairs per turn of DNA and you start losing body cells at an ever increasing rate. Your wounds don’t heal as fast and your skin starts to age much faster. 
The combined ORME, atoms with all their protons in a large nucleus with weak atomic forces allows the mitochondria within each of our human cells to transmute the necessary elements for cell division. Its called transmutation of elements that we are taught in school is impossible but our body does it at the rate of over 6-miollion times a second.  To maintain your present form without ageing you have to replicate more than 6-million body cells a second. This takes a lot of energy and the necessary trace minerals to replicate three-billion RNA and DNA sequences in each of the 6-million cells that you are replicating every second.
This technology has been around since the beginning of time. David Hudson currently holds the patents on ORMES. I wrote the book, Philosophers Stone about the history and use of ORMES 25-years ago. Thousands of people around the world are currently making this stuff in their kitchens using the alkaline recipes in my book. King Solomon who was famous for his god mines made most of his money selling bread. I believe he was shipping most of it off planet.  It was the whole grain unleavened priest bread containing ORME gold. ORMES combine with hydrochloric acid in the stomach into a chloride so the course grain priest bread is needed to carry it into the lower intestines where it can be absorbed by the body. The ancient people fasted before taking the priest bread to reduce the hydrochloric acid in the stomach.
The Anunnaki couldn't get enough ORME gold out of sea water to provide for their needs so they created modern man using eggs from Mauri implanted into Neanderthal females. Modern man fit the bill perfectly. He is physically weaker than the Neanderthal, extremely subservient and breads prolifically. He is easily brainwashed to worship practically anything that comes along because he refuses to uses his brain as exemplified by the continuous state of war on this planet.
Remember, in Genesis, when the 'plural' 'gods' left earth mankind was given dominion over the planet. Mankind was given dominion over all the animals and even the fish in the sea. The Gods figured that he was smart enough to take care of the planet and not marry their first cousins. Boy, were they were wrong!!!
Enlil, headquartered at Eurk later known as Baalbek in Lebanon worked his slaves to death killing many thousands. His brother Enki and his son, Marduk on the other hand, gave mankind knowledge. Enki, contrary to the decision of the Council, warned Noah of the coming flood and through his son, Marduk help design the ship that would carry his family to safety. Unlike any ship today the Ark had wells amidships to raise and lower five-ton, ballast stones. It also had 40-foot-long, tree trunks projecting fore and after underwater that had additional ballast stones attached with strong ropes. There was no way this ship could be overturned as it had more than seventy, five ton ballast rocks suspended below the hull--a total of 350 tons of ballast.      
When the Gods come back there will be hell to pay because half the oxygen-producing plankton in the oceans is missing, half the fish are gone and the rest polluted with radiation from ruptured atomic reactors. Half the oil has been burned to fight wars to reduce populations and make rich men richer. Three-quarters the rain forests have been burned and made into charcoal to cook food. Half the top soils have been flushed into the oceans. Oxygen levels have plummeted from 30% at the time of Moses to 20% today. Radiation levels in the northern hemisphere have doubled in the last sixty years. Ten percent of the 30 or so million plant and animal species on the planet went extinct in the last sixty years. The Gods will definitely be pissed. I hate to speculate what they will do to us when they find out.


There are six recipes in my book, Philosophers Stone to take it out of sea water, limestone, Great Salt Lake participate, granite powder, volcanic soils etc., etc. This knowledge is worth millions of dollars because to cures all disease by rebuilding your DNA –taking you back to when you were a twenty years old. Philosophers Stone can be ordered by calling 1-877-buy-book. Or, by going on line to my web site: www.GuardDogBooks.com and clicking on the book cover. You can also order it from Amazon.com.

Monday, March 23, 2015

AFFORDABLE CARE ACT not!

Take a moment to read
 
Too bad we seniors are such a drag on the Obama Administration!!!
  

Subject: Golden years?
  


 
Please take the time to read and pass this on  . . . .
 
Letter from a senior gentleman in Mesa , Arizona :
 
Dear Family, Friends, Neighbors, and former Classmates,
 
I just found myself in the middle of a medical situation that made it
very clear that "the Affordable Care Act" is neither affordable, nor
do they care.
 
I'll go back about seven years ago to a fairly radical prostate
surgery that I underwent. The Urologist (a personal Friend) who
performed  the surgery was very concerned that it was cancer, though I
wasn't told this until the lab report revealed it was benign.
 
Since that procedure, I have experienced numerous urinary tract
infections, UTI's.
Since I had never had a "UTI" prior to the prostate surgery, I assumed
that it is one of the side effects from surgery, an assumption since
confirmed by my Family Doctor.
 
The weekend of March 8-9, I was experiencing all the symptoms of
another bout of UTI. By Monday afternoon the infection had hit with
full force.
Knowing that all I needed was an antibiotic, I went to an Urgent Care
Center in  Mesa , AZ , to provide a specimen a requirement for getting
the prescription.
 
After waiting 45 minutes to see the Doctor, I started getting very
nauseous and light headed.
 
I went to the Receptionist to ask where the bathroom was, as I felt
that I  was going to throw up. I was told that I would have to wait for
the Doctor because I would have to leave a specimen and they didn't
want me in the bathroom without first seeing him.
 
That was when the lights went out. My next awareness was that of
finding myself on the floor (in the waiting room) having violent dry
heaves, and very confused. At this point, I tried to stand up but
couldn't make it, and they made it very clear they weren't going to
let me get up until the ambulance got there. By the way, when you're
waiting to see the Doctor and you pass out, you get very prompt
attention.
 
Now, "the rest of the story", and the reason for sending this to so many
of you.
 
I was taken to the nearest hospital, to emergency. Once there, I was
transported to an emergency examination room. Once I had removed my
clothes and donned one of those lovely hospital gowns, I finally got
to see a Doctor.
I asked "what is going on? I'm just having a UTI. Just get me the
proper medication and let me go home." He told me that my symptoms
presented the possibility of sepsis, a potentially deadly migration of
toxins, and that they needed to run several tests to determine how far
the infection had migrated.
 
For the next 3 hours I was subjected to several tests, blood draws,
EKG's, and demands for specimens. At about 7:30 the nurse came back to
my room to inform me that one of the tests takes 1- 2 days to
complete. I asked if they (the results) could be emailed, at which
point she informed me that I wouldn't need them emailed because I
wasn't going anywhere. I started arguing with her, but was told, "If
you don't start behaving, I'll start taking your temperature
rectally," at which point I became a perfect gentleman. I did tell her
I wanted  to see the doctor because I had no intention of  staying
overnight.
 
Now, this is what I want each of you to understand. Please read these
next sentences carefully. The doctor finally came in to inform me that
he was going to admit me. I said, "Are you admitting me for treatment
or for observation?"
He told me that I would be admitted for observation. I said, "Doctor,
correct me if I'm wrong, but if you admit me for observation, my
Medicare will not pay anything. This due to the Affordable Care Act."
He said,"That's right, it won't."
 
I then grabbed for my bag of clothing and said, "Then I'm going home."
He said you're really too sick to be going home, but I understand your
position. This health program is going to hit seniors especially hard.
 
The doctor then left the room and I started getting dressed. I was
just getting ready to put my shoes on when another doctor (the  closer)
came into the room. He saw me dressed and said, "Where do you think
you are going?" I simply said "I'm going home." To which he replied,
quite vociferously, "No you aren't. I  said, "Doc, you and I both know
that under the  "Affordable Care Act" anyone on Medicare who is
admitted to a hospital for observation will be responsible for the
bill. Medicare won't pay a cent."
 
At which point he nodded in affirmation. I said, "You will either
admit me for a specific treatment or you won't admit me." Realizing he
wasn't going to win this one, he said he would prepare my release
papers.
A few minutes later, the discharge nurse came to my room to have me
sign the necessary papers, relieving them from any responsibility. I
told her I wasn't trying to be obstinate, but I wasn't going to be
burdened with the full (financial) responsibility for my hospital stay.
 
After making sure the door was closed, she said, "I don't blame you at
all, I would do the same thing."
She went on to say, "You wouldn't believe the people who elect to
leave for the  same reasons, people who are deathly sick, people who
have to be wheeled out on a gurney." She further said, "The
'Affordable Care Act' is going to be a disaster for seniors. Yet, if
you are in this country illegally, and have no coverage, you will be
covered in  full."
 
This is not internet hype folks, this is real. I just experienced it
personally.
Moving right along, this gets worse.
 
Today I went to a (required) follow up appointment with my Arizona
Family Practitioner. Since my white count was pretty high, the follow
up was important. During the visit, I shared the experience at
emergency, and that I had refused to be admitted. His response was,
"I don't blame you at all, I would have done the same thing." He went on
to say that the  colonoscopy and other procedures are probably going  to
be dropped from coverage for those over 70."
 
I told him that I had heard that the "Affordable Care Act" would no
longer pay for cancer treatment for those 76 and older, is that true?
His understanding is that it is true. The more I hear, and experience
the more I'm beginning to see that we seniors are nothing more than
an inconvenience, and  the sooner they can get rid of us the better 
off they'll be.
 
We can have  an impact on this debacle by letting everyone in Congress
know that their responsibility is to the constituents, not the
president and not the lobbyists. We need to let them ALL know that
they are in office to serve and to look after the BEST INTERESTS of
"we the people," their employers, and not to become self serving
bureaucrats who serve only out of greed. And if they don't seem to
understand this simple logic, we'll fire them.
 
REMEMBER:
Demand your hospital admission is for TREATMENT and NOT for OBSERVATION!
 
SEND THIS TO EVERY SENIOR AND ALL MILITARY (ACTIVE OR VET) AND LET
THEM KNOW THIS IS HOW OUR REPRESENTATIVES ON CAPITOL HILL TREAT THOSE
WHO RISK IT ALL SO THEY CAN SIT UP THERE AND ENJOY ALL THE BENEFITS
THEY EXEMPT FROM  THE REST OF US.
 
WE ARE MAD AND WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!
  

Click here: FAQ: Hospital Observation Care Can Be Costly For Medicare
Patients | Kaiser Health News
http://kaiserhealthnews.org/ news/observation-care-faq/
  
  
  
Click here:  Colonoscopy for over 70 May Not Be Necessary -  Colorectal
Cancer Screening -AARP_
http://www.aarp.org/health/ conditions-treatments/info-04- 2013/do-you-need-that- colonoscopy.html
Stay  tuned...money saving or sincere????
  
  
  
SEE TRUTH OR FICTION  http:
 
 http://www.truthorfiction. com/rumors/m/Medicare-Under- Observation.htm#.VMf27Fr69gM
  

Thursday, March 12, 2015

ARE VACCINES EFFECTIVE?

Mar 112015
 
Questions That Stump Every Pro-Vaccine Advocate and Their Claims
March 9, 2015
Since the flu pandemic was declared, there have been several so-called ‘vaccine experts’ coming out of the wood work attempting to justify the effectiveness of vaccines. All of them parrot the same ridiculous historical and pseudoscientific perspectives of vaccinations which are easily squelched with the following 9 questions.
Claim: The study of vaccines, their historical record of achievements, effectiveness, safety and mechanism in humans are well understood and proven in scientific and medical circles.
Fact: The claim is completely false.
1. What to ask: Could you please provide one double-blind, placebo-controlled study that can prove the safety and effectiveness of vaccines?
2. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific evidence on ANY study which can confirm the long-term safety and effectiveness of vaccines?
3. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific evidence which can prove that disease reduction in any part of the world, at any point in history was attributable to inoculation of populations?
4. What to ask: Could you please explain how the safety and mechanism of vaccines in the human body are scientifically proven if their pharmacokinetics (the study of bodily absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of ingredients) are never examined
or analyzed in any vaccine study?
One of the most critical elements which defines the toxicity potential of any vaccine are its pharmacokinetic properties. Drug companies and health agencies refuse to consider the study, analysis or evaluation of the pharmacokinetic properties of any vaccine.
There is not one double-blind, placebo-controlled study in the history of vaccine development that has ever proven their safety, effectiveness or achievements (unless those achievements have underlined their damage to human health).
There are also no controlled studies completed in any country which have objectively proven that vaccines have had any direct or consequential effect on the reduction of any type of disease in any
part of the world.
Every single study that has ever attempted to validate the safety and effectiveness of vaccines has conclusively established carcinogenic, mutagenic, neurotoxic or fertility impairments, but they won’t address those.
Claim: Preservatives and chemical additives used in the manufacture of vaccines are safe and no studies have been linked or proven them unsafe for use in humans.
Fact: The claim is completely false.
5. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification as to how injecting a human being with a confirmed neurotoxin is beneficial to human health and prevents disease?
6. What to ask: Can you provide a risk/benefit profile on how the benefits of injecting a known neurotoxin exceeds its risks to human health for the intended goal of preventing disease?
This issue is no longer even open to debate. It is a scientifically established fact in literally hundreds of studies that the preservatives and chemical additives in vaccines damage cells. Neurotoxicity, immune suppression, immune-mediated chronic inflammation and carcinogenic proliferation are just a few of several effects that have been observed on the human body. See a list of chemicals in vaccines
Fortunately, the drug companies still tell us the damage vaccines have on the human body. People just don’t read them. All you have to do is look at the insert for any vaccine, and it will detail the exact ingredients, alerts and potentially lethal effects.
Any medical professional who believes that it is justified to inject any type of neurotoxin into any person to prevent any disease is completely misguided, misinformed, deluded and ignorant of any logic regarding human health.
Claim: Once an individual is injected with the foreign antigen in the vaccine, that individual becomes immune to future infections.
Fact: The claim is completely false.
7. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification on how bypassing the respiratory tract (or mucous membrane) is advantageous and how directly injecting viruses into the bloodstream enhances immune functioning and prevents future infections?
8. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification on how a vaccine would prevent viruses from mutating?
9. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification as to how a vaccination can target a virus in an infected individual who does not have the exact viral configuration or strain the vaccine was developed for?
All promoters of vaccination fail to realize that the respiratory tract of humans (actually all mammals) contains antibodies which initiates natural immune responses within the respiratory tract mucosa. Bypassing this mucosal aspect of the immune system by directly injecting viruses into the bloodstream leads to a corruption in the immune system itself. As a result, the pathogenic viruses or bacteria cannot be eliminated by the immune system and remain in the body, where they will further grow and/or mutate as the individual is exposed to ever more antigens and toxins in the environment which continue to assault the immune system.
Despite the injection of any type of vaccine, viruses continue circulating through the body, mutating and transforming into other organisms. The ability of a vaccine manufacturer to target the exact viral strain without knowing its mutagenic properties is equivalent to shooting a gun at a fixed target that has already been moved from its location. You would be shooting at what was, not what is!
Flu viruses, may mutate, change or adapt several times over a period of one flu season, making the seasonal influenza vaccine 100% redundant and ineffective every single flu season. Ironically, the natural immune defenses of the human body can target these changes but the vaccines cannot.
I have never encountered one pro-vaccine advocate, whether medically or scientifically qualified, who could answer even 1 let alone all 9 of these questions. One or all of the following will happen when debating any of the above questions:
  • They will concede defeat and admit they are stumped
  • They will attempt to discredit unrelated issues that do not pertain to the question.
  • They will formulate their response and rebuttal based on historical arguments and scientific studies which have been disproved over and over again.
Not one pro-vaccine advocate will ever directly address these questions in an open mainstream venue.

Source: http://in5d.com/9-questions-that-stump-every-pro-vaccine-advocate-and-their-claims/

No virus found in this message.

My smart wife says, "Why do parents complain when you refuse to get your child vaccinated? If the vaccines are effective then the parents who had their children vaccinated shouldn't have anything to worry about."
www.GuardDogbooks.com